The conclusions drawn by the secondary work may be valid but without checking the original, you cannot be sure that there is no inaccuracy or misrepresentation of information. Where you read about an original work in another source you are presented with another’s interpretation of that original work. You can then quote or paraphrase from that original work. It is good practice to read the original directly so you can review the information and draw your own conclusions and interpretation of the original work. Secondary referencing is not recommended as good academic practice and where possible you should avoid it by tracing and reading the original work which you can then cite in your footnotes and bibliography. a journal article that was discussed in a blogpost or on a webpage.a piece of legislation that was summarised in a podcast.a legal case that you read about in a book rather than reading the case report.Watch a video on secondary referencing to learn more. Secondary referencing means referring to a work that you have not read in the original but have learned about from another source.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |